Gathering and Elaborating Requirements
After initiation (charter, contract, scope), the most substantial phase begins — requirements. In the system, it is built around the living BRD: a document that grows with the project and always reflects what is settled and what is still open.
Prerequisites: the charter and scope — see Project initiation.
Step 1. BRD kickoff: /requirements
Type /requirements. The agent:
- Reads the charter, scope, and, if present, the contract analysis.
- Searches the Confluence knowledge base for reusable requirements, specifications, and roadmaps of the project.
- Proposes the BRD structure — by scope blocks, with common sections. The structure can be edited: drop blocks, add your own.
- After your confirmation, creates the BRD as a working document: each block gets its subsections — destination, open decisions, not yet specified, out of scope, functional and non-functional requirements, acceptance criteria.
The file is not created before the structure is confirmed — the agent does not write the BRD "on a guess".
Step 2. Map of unknowns: /elicit
Requirements rarely arrive ready-made. Type /elicit — the agent builds a map of unknowns by block:
- Open decisions — sharp questions that can already be phrased ("what response latency is acceptable?").
- Not yet specified — uncertainties that cannot yet be phrased as a question.
- Out of scope — what is explicitly excluded for the block.
Everything is recorded in the BRD as review blocks. The chart is not a tracker task list: it lives in the document and updates as decisions are made.
Step 3. Decision drill-down: /question
When a question becomes sharp, type /question — the agent runs a detailed interview, one decision at a time:
- questions are asked one at a time, pausing for your answer;
- for each question the agent gives a recommended option — you confirm or adjust it;
- facts that can be found in the system (issues, pages, documents) the agent looks up itself instead of asking;
- decisions belong to you: the agent does not close a decision without your answer.
Once shared understanding is reached, the agent summarizes the agreement and lands it in the BRD: the item moves from "open decisions" to "decisions" with a one-line gist. The next decision is a new /question pass.
Step 4. Specification: /specify
When a block's requirements are sufficient, type /specify. The agent does not re-interview — it synthesizes what is already settled into an implementation specification (implementation-spec.md):
- the problem and solution from the user's perspective;
- an extensive user-story list;
- implementation decisions (modules, interfaces, architecture) — without file paths that go stale fast;
- testing decisions;
- what is explicitly out of scope;
- source references: BRD, charter, scope, Confluence pages.
If the block still lacks concrete requirements and criteria, the agent stops and offers /elicit / /question first — it does not write a template from thin air.
Step 5. Tickets: /tickets
Type /tickets — the agent breaks the specification (or a ready BRD slice) into vertical slices:
- each slice cuts a complete path through all layers (data, logic, UI, tests) and, when done, is demoable;
- each slice is sized to fit a single working session;
- every ticket has dependencies: which tickets must finish first ("blocked by");
- before publishing, the agent shows the breakdown and checks: granularity, correct dependencies, what to merge or split.
Publishing happens only through your confirmation: each ticket is created as a proposal in the tracker (you can open it in the issue editor, adjust fields, and only then create it). After creation, the agent offers a back-link from the ticket into the specification/BRD — so the document and the tracker do not drift apart.
How it becomes a cycle
/scope (done)
→ /requirements — BRD structure and skeleton
→ /elicit — map of unknowns by block
→ /question — decision by decision (until the unknowns are cleared)
→ /specify — specification for ready blocks
→ /tickets — tickets from the specification
→ (next: estimation and planning — see the next guide)
What the agent does not do
- Does not create tickets silently — every tracker publish is through your confirmation.
- Does not invent requirements — when the seeds (charter, scope, Confluence) are insufficient, the agent says what is missing instead of filling the document from memory.
- Does not mix levels — scope does not become a task list, and the BRD does not become a technical specification: each document has its own level of detail.
Where to continue
- Schedule planning — estimation, work structure, and the plan.
- Project documents: creation and upkeep — how the created documents live.
